RESEARCH PAPER
Biostimulators as a factor affecting the dry matter yield and starch content of edible potato tubers
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agriculture, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Poland
Final revision date: 2019-04-15
Acceptance date: 2019-04-15
Publication date: 2019-04-30
Corresponding author
Iwona Teresa Mystkowska
Department of Agriculture, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Sidorska 95/97, 21-500, Biała Podlaska, Poland
Acta Agroph. 2019, 26(1), 37-45
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The experiment was carried out as a two-factor experiment in a split-plot system, repeated three times within the years 2015-2017 on an individual farm. The following factors were examined: I – three varieties of edible potato: Honorata, Jelly, Tajfun, and II – four types of biostimulators used in three periods (beginning of flowering, full flowering and after flowering of the plants): Kelpak SL®, dosage 0.20 mg l–1, Titanit®, dosage 0.20 mg l–1, GreenOk®, dosage 0.20 mg l–1, BrunatneBio Złoto®, dosage 0.20 mg l–1 and a control variant (without the use of biostimulators). The aim of the study was to determine the effect of biostimulators on the dry matter yield and starch yield of edible potato tubers. The content of dry matter was determined by means of a dry weight method. The starch content was determined using the Reimann hydrostatic balance. Dry matter yield and starch yield were calculated as a product of the total yield and the content of individual components. The results obtained were statistically analysed with the use of the analysis of variance. The use of biostimulators in the experiment increased the amount of dry matter yield and the yield of edible potato tuber starch as compared with the control plot. The reaction of the different varieties to the biostimulators used was diverse. The highest dry matter yield and starch yield was produced by the Jelly variety. The BrunatneBio Złoto biostimulator significantly increased the dry matter yield and starch yield as compared with the control variant. The Jelly variety produced the highest dry matter yield and starch yield, while the Honorata variety reacted with a decrease in the yield in relation to the variant in which the biostimulator was not used. The diverse climatic conditions prevailing during the growing season in the years when the research was conducted influenced the yield of dry matter and starch.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Authors does not declare conflict of interest.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Barbaś P., Sawicka B., 2016. The effect of weeding methods on the content and yield of dry matter and starch in tubers of two potato varieties. Fragm. Agron., 33(4), 7-17.
2.
Bienia B., Sawicka B., Krochmal-Marczak B., 2018. Influence of foliar fertilization with macro- and microelement fertilizers on the yield and yield structure of several potato varieties. Fragm. Agron., 35(1), 17-28.
3.
Boguszewska D., Czerko Z., Goliszewski W., Grudzińska M., Lutomirska B., Nowacki W., Szutkowska M., Trawczyński C., Wierzbicka A., Zarzyńska K., Zgórska K., 2011. Characteristics of the National Register of Potato Varieties. Nowacki W. (Ed.) Wyd. IHAR-PIB, Oddział Jadwisin, 1-40.
4.
Budzyński, W., Dubis, B., Jankowski, A., 2008. Response of Winter oilseed rape to the biostimulator Asahi SL applied in spring. Monographs series: Biostimulators in modern agriculture, Field Crop. Wieś Jutra, 47-55.
5.
Czeczko, R., Mikos-Bielak, M., 2004. Effects of Asahi bio-stimulator application in the cultivation of different vegetable species. Ann. UMCS, Agric., 59(3), 1073-1079.
6.
Fageria N.K., Filho B.M.P., Moreira A., Guimarӑes C.M., 2009. Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J. Plant Nutrition 32, 1044-1064,
https://doi.org/10.1080/019041....
7.
Fernandez V., Sotiropoulos T., Brown P., 2013. Foliar fertilization. Scientific, principles and field practices. International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA). Paris, France, ss: 144.
8.
Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Baranowska A., 2008. The influence of soil cultivation and methods of weeding on yield of nutrients and economic efficiency of potato cultivation. Vol. I. Potato nutrient yield. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 7(2), 21-31.
9.
Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Sikorska A., Mystkowska I., Dołęga H., 2017. The effect of herbicides and growth biostimulators on reducing weed infestation and yielding of edible potato. Fragm. Agron., 34(4), 59-66.
10.
Gugała M., Zarzecka K., 2010. The effect of adjuvants on yielding and limitation of weeds on potato plantations. Biul. IHAR, 255, 47-57.
11.
Harasimowicz-Herman, G., Borowska, M., 2006. The effects of the Asahi SL biostimulator in the cultivation of winter oilseed rape depending on the pluvio-thermal conditions. Rośliny Oleiste XXVII(1), 95-106.
12.
Keutgen A.J., Pobereżny J., Wszelaczyńska E., Murawska B., Spychaj-Fabisiak E., 2014. The influence of storage on darkening processes of potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) and their pro-health properties. Inż. Ap. Chem., 53(2), 086-088.
13.
Kołodziejczyk M., Szmigiel A., 2012. Chemical composition and selected quality parameters of potato tubers depending on the date and degree of reduction of plant assimilation area. Fragm. Agron., 29(3), 88-94.
14.
Krzysztofik B., 2009. The effect of soil cultivation on the level of potato tuber size uniformity and starch yield. Acta Agroph. 14(2), 355-365.
15.
Maciejewski T., Szukała J., Jarosz A., 2007. The impact of the Asahi SL biostimulator on the quality characteristics of potato tubers. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 52(3), 109-112.
16.
Mazurczyk W., Wierzbicka A., Trawczyński C., 2009. Harvest index of potato crop grown under different nitrogen and water supply. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 8(4), 15-21.
18.
Pszczółkowski P., Sawicka B., 2018. The effect of application of biopreparations and fungicides on the yield and selected parameters of seed value of seed potatoes. Acta Agroph., 25(2), 239-255,
https://doi.org/10.31545/aagr/....
19.
Sawicka B., Krochmal-Marczak B., 2009. The effects of combined use of foliar fertilizers and growth bioregulators in the cultivation of new potato varieties. Annales UMCS, E-64(2), 29-38,
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10081....
20.
Sawicka B., Pszczółkowski P., 2017. The phenotypic variability of the yield and its structure of very early and early potato varieties. Fragm. Agron., 34(1), 76-91.
21.
Singh J., Singh M., Jain A., Bhardwaj S., Singh A., Singh D.K., Bhushan B., Dubey S.K. 2013. An introduction of plant nutrients and foliar fertilization: a review. In: Precision farming: a new approach. Daya Publishing Company. New Delhi, 252-320.
22.
Trętowski, J., Wójcik, R., 1988. Methodology of agricultural experience. Wyd. WSRP, Siedlce, 1-500.
23.
Wierzbicka A., 2012. Influence of cultivar, nitrogen fertilization and harvesting time on dry matter and starch content in early potato tubers. Fragm. Agron., 29(2), 134-142.
24.
Wszelaczyńska E., Pobereżny J., Gruszczewski M., 2014. Storage stability and stability of qualitative features of selected potato varieties with different directions of use. Inż. Ap. Chem., 53(2), 127-129.
25.
Zgórska K., Grudzińska M., 2012. Changes in selected quality traits of potato tubers during storage. Acta Agroph., 19(1), 203-214.
26.
Żołnowski A.C., 2013. Studies on variability of yield and quality of edible potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under conditions of differentiated mineral fertilization. 2013 UWM Olsztyn (Rozprawy i monografie – Dissertations and Monographs), 191, ss. 259.